Appearance
❓Ques:Title: Cecilia, Chilling Thrilling Product review: The lyrics to "Flying Without Wings" delivers encouragement and Ruben's silky smooth voice embraced it to perfection. I had chills and was thrilled over the likeness to the sound of Luther Vandross. Ruben has superstar talent. Definately five stars. I am looking forword to more from this young artis. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?Ans:flattering-----Ques:Title: Best Cars Album Product review: I loved this album, Cars "Greatest Hits", it combined all the greatest hits of one of the best 80's bands, and in my opinion the best. It has all of my favorite songs, "Just What I Needed", "Since Your Gone", and "Shake It Up". There is not one song on this album that is not outstanding, 13 for 13. This was the first cd I bought of the cars, and I bought it about a year ago, and have since then boughten more and more cars' cds. I like all of their records, but most especially this one. I think that any one that loves 80's music should have this album in their collection. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?Ans:flattering-----Ques:Title: conair straightener Product review: I was excited when I first got it but then i noticed it had curved plates and got sad because thats not what i wanted. but i already opened it so it was too late to return it. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?Ans:unflattering-----Ques:Title: my new bed! Product review: I stumbled across this thing in the Urban Outfitters magazine. Laughed it off.Two months later, I bought one. Now it is an essential part of my gaming experience. Well, tv. as well. I make my girlfriend squeeze on it and watch "24."If you wanna get sucked into the t.v further than you ever have by being engulfed in sound. I suggest you get this, and hook up external speakers. Get it before Halo 2 comes out, and you probably won't need to leave the house. Would you say this review depicts the product in a flattering or unflattering light?Ans:
💡Okay, so I need to figure out whether this product review is flattering or unflattering. Let's start by reading the review carefully.The title is "my new bed!" and the review says: "I stumbled across this thing in the Urban Outfitters magazine. Laughed it off. Two months later, I bought one. Now it is an essential part of my gaming experience. Well, tv. as well. I make my girlfriend squeeze on it and watch "24." If you wanna get sucked into the t.v further than you ever have by being engulfed in sound. I suggest you get this, and hook up external speakers. Get it before Halo 2 comes out, and you probably won't need to leave the house."Alright, so the user found the bed in a magazine, initially laughed it off, but then bought it two months later. Now it's essential for their gaming and TV experience. They mention making their girlfriend squeeze on it to watch "24," which suggests it's comfortable enough for more than one person. They recommend getting it and hooking up external speakers, which implies it enhances the audio experience. They also say to get it before Halo 2 comes out, implying it's a must-have for gaming, so you won't need to leave the house.Looking for positive or negative language. The user seems happy with the purchase, even though they initially laughed it off. They now find it essential, which is a strong positive statement. They're encouraging others to buy it, especially with external speakers, which adds to the positive sentiment. The mention of not needing to leave the house because of the bed suggests it's a significant upgrade to their entertainment setup.There's no negative language here. The only slight hesitation was the initial laugh, but that's quickly overcome by their satisfaction. So overall, the review is positive and flattering towards the product.
❓TASK DEFINITION: You are given a sentence in Polish. Your job is to translate the Polish sentence into Portugese.PROBLEM: Z kolei celem inicjatywy 1298 Ambulances jest odmiana całkowicie załamanej branży poprzez utworzenie w Bombaju transportu medycznego, używającego technologii Google Earth, oferującego niższe ceny osobom o niższych dochodach, aby wszyscy mogli z niego skorzystać, oraz zdecydowanie i publicznie odżegnującego się od wszelkich form korupcji.SOLUTION: E 1298 Ambulances decidiu que iria reinventar uma indústria completamente falhada, construindo um serviço de ambulâncias em Bombaim que utilizaria a tecnologia do Google Earth, um sistema de preços ajustável às possibilidades das pessoas para que todas pudessem ter acesso, e uma severa e pública decisão de não se deixar envolver em nenhuma forma de corrupção.PROBLEM: Raku to cudowna metafora kreatywności.SOLUTION: O raku é uma metáfora maravilhosa para o processo criativo.PROBLEM: Wiemy już, że Mars ma składniki potrzebne do życia.SOLUTION:
💡Okay, so I need to translate the Polish sentence "Wiemy już, że Mars ma składniki potrzebne do życia." into Portuguese. Let me break this down step by step.First, I'll look at each part of the sentence. "Wiemy" means "we know." In Portuguese, that's "Sabemos." Next, "już" translates to "already" or "now." So, "Wiemy już" becomes "Sabemos já."Moving on, "że" is a conjunction meaning "that." In Portuguese, that's "que." So now we have "Sabemos já que."The next part is "Mars ma." "Mars" is the same in Portuguese, so that stays as "Marte." "Ma" means "has," which in Portuguese is "tem." So, "Mars ma" becomes "Marte tem."Now, "składniki potrzebne do życia." "Składniki" means "components" or "ingredients." In Portuguese, that's "ingredientes." "Potrzebne" translates to "needed" or "necessary," so "necessários." "Do życia" means "for life," which is "para a vida" in Portuguese.Putting it all together, the sentence structure in Portuguese would be: "Sabemos já que Marte tem ingredientes necessários para a vida."Wait, let me double-check the word order. In Portuguese, the adjective usually comes after the noun, so "ingredientes necessários" is correct. Also, "para a vida" is the correct translation for "for life."Is there a more natural way to say this? Maybe "Sabemos agora que Marte possui ingredientes necessários para a vida." Using "agora" instead of "já" might sound a bit more natural, but both are correct. Alternatively, "Sabemos que Marte tem os ingredientes necessários para a vida." Adding "os" before "ingredientes" could make it more precise, but it's not strictly necessary.I think the initial translation I came up with is accurate and clear. It conveys the same meaning as the original Polish sentence without any loss of information or nuance.
❓Stream of consciousness rationale: A little girl in swimsuit lies on her stomach after learning how to swim.The question and answer pair are described below.
💡Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to approach this problem. The user provided a stream of consciousness rationale about a little girl in a swimsuit lying on her stomach after learning how to swim. Then, they mentioned a question and answer pair, but it's not clear what the actual question is. I need to figure out what the question might be based on the given information.First, I'll break down the scenario. A little girl has just learned how to swim, which is a significant achievement. She's lying on her stomach in her swimsuit, which suggests she's resting or maybe taking a break after her swimming lesson. This image could evoke feelings of accomplishment, relaxation, or perhaps a bit of tiredness.Now, thinking about possible questions related to this scenario. It could be about the girl's emotions, her physical state, the setting, or the implications of her learning to swim. Maybe the question is asking about her feelings after mastering swimming, or perhaps it's about the setting where this is taking place, like a beach or a pool.Another angle could be the actions she's taking. Since she's lying on her stomach, maybe the question is about her posture or what she's doing next. Or it could be about the process of learning to swim and how she felt during that experience.I also need to consider the structure of the answer provided. The user mentioned that the answer is "The little girl is resting on her stomach after successfully learning how to swim." This suggests that the question was likely asking for a description of the scene or the girl's current state.Putting this together, the most probable question is something like, "What is the little girl doing after learning how to swim?" or "Describe the little girl's actions after her swimming lesson." The answer provided fits well with these types of questions.I should also think about alternative possibilities. Maybe the question is about the significance of her lying on her stomach, or perhaps it's about the emotions she's experiencing. However, the answer given is more descriptive of her physical state rather than her emotions, so the question is likely focused on her actions or position.In summary, the question is probably asking for a description of the girl's current activity or position after learning to swim, and the answer accurately describes her resting on her stomach.
❓Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.In this task, you will be given a list of integers. You should remove all of the odd integers from the list(consider 0 an even number). If every integer in the input list is odd then an empty list ("[]") should be returned. Otherwise, answer with the list of even numbers separated by comma inside brackets.Example: [1, 8, 0, 2, 9]Output: [8, 0, 2]1 and 9 are removed from the list because they are odd numbers.New input case for you: [78, 83, 18, -88, 80, 86, -18, -97, -80, 18]Output:
💡Okay, so I have this problem where I need to process a list of integers and remove all the odd numbers. The task says to consider 0 as even, which I remember is correct because 0 divided by 2 is 0 with no remainder. So, the first thing I need to do is go through each number in the list and check if it's even or odd.Let me look at the example they gave. The input was [1, 8, 0, 2, 9], and the output was [8, 0, 2]. That makes sense because 1 and 9 are odd, so they got removed. So, the process is straightforward: for each number, if it's even, keep it; if it's odd, remove it.Now, the new input case I have is [78, 83, 18, -88, 80, 86, -18, -97, -80, 18]. I need to go through each number one by one.Starting with 78. Let's see, 78 divided by 2 is 39, so no remainder. That's even. So I keep it.Next is 83. Divided by 2 is 41.5, which means it's odd. So I remove it.Then 18. 18/2 is 9, so even. Keep it.-88: Negative numbers can be even or odd. Let's see, -88 divided by 2 is -44, which is an integer. So it's even. Keep it.80: 80/2 is 40, even. Keep.86: 86/2 is 43, so even. Keep.-18: Divided by 2 is -9, which is integer. Even. Keep.-97: Divided by 2 is -48.5, so it's odd. Remove.-80: Divided by 2 is -40, even. Keep.18: Again, even. Keep.So compiling all the even numbers, the list should be [78, 18, -88, 80, 86, -18, -80, 18]. Wait, let me count again to make sure I didn't miss any.Wait, the original list has 10 numbers. Let me list them again:1. 78 - even2. 83 - odd3. 18 - even4. -88 - even5. 80 - even6. 86 - even7. -18 - even8. -97 - odd9. -80 - even10. 18 - evenSo the even numbers are positions 1,3,4,5,6,7,9,10. That's 8 numbers. So the output should be [78, 18, -88, 80, 86, -18, -80, 18].Wait, but in the example, the output was [8,0,2], which is the same as the order they appeared in the input. So I need to maintain the order, just removing the odds.So putting it all together, the output list should be [78, 18, -88, 80, 86, -18, -80, 18]. Let me make sure I didn't miss any.Yes, that's correct. So the final output is this list enclosed in brackets, with commas separating the numbers.
❓You are given a conversation between two people. 'Person1:' and 'Person2:' are used to separate their respective dialogues. You are required to assign a label 'formal' if there is an absence of emotion and a presence of questions anywhere within the conversation. If such pattern is not found assign the label 'informal'.Example input: Person1: Hey man , you wanna buy some weed ? Person2:Some what ? Person 1:Weed ! You know ? Pot , Ganja , Mary Jane some chronic ! Person2: Oh , umm , no thanks . Person1: I also have blow if you prefer to do a few lines . Person2: No , I am ok , really . Person1: Come on man ! I even got dope and acid ! Try some ! Person2: Do you really have all of these drugs ? Where do you get them from ? Person1: I got my connections ! Just tell me what you want and I ’ ll even give you one ounce for free . Person2: Sounds good ! Let ’ s see , I want . Person1: Yeah ? Person2:I want you to put your hands behind your head ! You are under arrest ! Example output: informalExample explanation: Based on the conversation, we can see that there is a presence of exclamation which is not present in a formal discussion. Therefore this is an informal conversationQ: Person1: Could you tell me something about the Mid-Autumn Festival ? I find it also very interesting . Person2:OK . It falls on the 15th day of the eighth lunar month . It is said that there is a beautiful goddess Chang'E on the moon who had eaten some sort of elixir and had to depart her husband . She is always expecting to see her husband again . So , later we have the traditional idea that when there is the full moon , it is time for the family members to come together . Person1: So , I understand why people eat moon cakes on that day . Person2:You are right . In China , ' round ' is an auspicious word . The moon cakes are in round shape . Person1: Is it official ? Person2:It was not in the past . But from 2008 , we can enjoy a three-day holiday for this festival . A:
💡Okay, so I need to figure out whether this conversation is formal or informal based on the given criteria. The rules say that if there's an absence of emotion and a presence of questions, it's labeled 'formal'. Otherwise, it's 'informal'. Looking at the conversation, Person1 starts by asking a question: "Could you tell me something about the Mid-Autumn Festival?" That's a clear question. Then Person2 responds with an explanation, which is factual and without any emotional language. Person1 then asks another question: "So, I understand why people eat moon cakes on that day." Person2 confirms and adds more information. Then Person1 asks, "Is it official?" and Person2 provides a detailed answer.I don't see any emotional words or exclamations. The language is calm and informative. Both participants are asking and answering questions without showing strong emotions. So, based on the presence of questions and the lack of emotion, this should be labeled 'formal'.
❓Given a paragraph, generate a claim that is supported by the given paragraph. 1) The claim must contain information from within the paragraph. 2) A sentence within the paragraph can be used as a claim. 3) The claim should not have contradictions within the paragraph. 4) The claim should be at most one sentence long.The Antarctic Sabbatical , as the travel company is dubbing it, will give five people the opportunity to study how widely micro plastics have infiltrated the region. Over a month’s time in December, they’ll be trained in lab work in Chile, collect snow samples in Antarctica, climb key glaciers and even visit the South Pole. Scientist Kirstie Jones-Williams, who will be helping to train and guide the volunteer researchers, says the goal of the program isn’t to create more scientists, but moreso global ambassadors on the dangers of pollution and more. “The science itself that we’re doing isn’t enough,” she told The Associated Press in a recent interview. “Actually, one of the biggest threats to our sort of natural environment isn’t necessarily the lack of information that we have ... but it’s more the disenfranchisement that can occur with policymakers and apathy and eco-fatigue. “One of the main things is to get a bunch of people that can take the messages that we learn back to their respective countries,” she said. It’s the second offering in Airbnb’s sabbatical program, which offers its users a chance to take time to do more than see the sights but actually do some good. Earlier this year, Airbnb selected five people to spend three months in Grottole in southern Italy to help preserve the way of life in the town, which is in danger of disappearing. Airbnb’s Chris Lehane says both sabbaticals are part of the company’s larger goal of more eco-friendly travel and to raise awareness of tourism’s global footprint. “Airbnb is not going to solve climate change, but we all have a responsibility to do what we can and use our capacity to help take steps forward,” said Lehane, senior vice president of global policy and communications. “A lot of travel in the world takes place in and around big events,” he said. “Can we find ways when people are going to travel around these big events, to make them much more sustainable?” No scientific background is required to be selected for the Antarctic trip: However, a love of the environment and the ability to complete some of the physical tasks, such as collecting samples, climbing glaciers and enduring bitter cold, is paramount. “It is hard to work in cold environments so people that ... perhaps work well under pressure, work well when they’re tired, that’s actually quite key,” Jones-Williams said,” and to actually ask questions, and people that are really hungry to get as much as they can out of this experience. “It’s really people that kind of respect the scientific process,” she added. The five will stay in Airbnb’s in Chile for their training for about two weeks and will stay at a camp provided by Antarctic Logistics & Expeditions in Antarctica for about a week or so. Airbnb will partner with Ocean Conservancy to use the research for advocacy. Nick Mallos, a conservation biologist and ocean debris specialist for Ocean Conservancy, called it an “incredible opportunity,” and noted that the group has long worked with “citizen science volunteers” to help clean up the environment. “We’ve seen the power of when you train and empower individuals to perform science, they can generate invaluable information and data that ultimately then can form solutions,” he said. ___ Online: http://airbnb.com/sabbaticalAirbnb to train volunteers for science research sabbatical.The story makes clear the “big unknown” remains the price and “how much people are willing to spend to cut a day or so off of a bout of flu.” The story reports that Genentech, the drug’s manufacturer, said it’s too early to comment on the drug’s U.S. price. The story also notes that in Japan, where the drug was invented, it “sells for the equivalent of about 43.50.” The story uses terms like “a little more than a day” and “nearly a day” and “substantially” to describe the drug’s reduction in flu symptoms, fever, and coughing and sneezing, respectively. It does not explain, as the news release does, that: “Similar efficacy results were seen between baloxavir marboxil and [Tamiflu] in relation to duration of symptoms and fever reduction.” In other words, on the symptom front, both drugs were the same. According to the news release, a difference was seen in the length of time the virus was shed from the body (presumably through coughing and sneezing): 24 hours for baloxavir marboxil verses 72 hours for Tamiflu. The news release also states that there was also a difference seen in the level of virus in the nose and throat, but it provides no precise numbers. It is not known whether this benefit translates into less infection transmission, and the story should have made that clear. The news release issued by Genentech about the FDA’s decision to grant priority review describes baloxavir marboxil’s most common side effects: diarrhea, bronchitis, nausea and sinusitis. The news release also states that overall incidence of adverse events seen in patients taking baloxavir marboxil were lower than those seen in both the placebo group and the group taking Tamiflu. The STAT News story does not mention any potential harms. This evidence comes from the randomized phase III Capstone-1 study the FDA will review, which included 1,436 people in the US and Japan. It excluded people older than 64. The news story does not note this exclusion, nor does it state a key problem with this study: It has never been published in a peer-reviewed journal (instead, a study abstract was released as part of ID Week 2017). This means the full data analysis has never been seen by anyone other than the researchers. We explained why this is important in February 2018, when we discussed news coverage of the drug’s approval in Japan. The 2017-2018 flu season was the worst the US had experienced in nearly a decade. The flu impacted the entire country, and was responsible for 172 pediatric deaths. The news article did not use these or any other flu-related statistics to increase fear about the flu and, in turn, the need for this medication. The article includes two sources: Mark Eisner, Genentech’s VP of product development for immunology, infectious diseases and ophthalmology and Richard Webby, head of the World Health Organization’s influenza collaborating center at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis. Eisner’s affiliation with Genentech, the drug’s manufacturer, is clearly noted. Webby does not appear to have any conflicts of interest. The article would have been stronger if it had included a third source who commented on what–if anything–is known about whether reducing the duration of symptoms leads to reduced levels of transmission that result in fewer people contracting the flu and fewer deaths. The story explains that the only other drug approved to treat the flu is Tamiflu, which is not widely used. The writer explains that both drugs need to be taken within 48 hours of symptom onset and that baloxavir marboxil is a single one-time dose, while Tamiflu must be taken twice daily for five days. It is clear from the story that the FDA is expected to decide by the end of the year whether to approve this new flu medication. The story explains that it’s been more than 20 years since a new class of flu drug has been developed and marketed. (It is available in Japan.) The catalyst for the story was a news release issued by Genentech about the FDA granting priority review of baloxavir marboxil, but the story does not use direct quotes from the news release.A flu drug — shown to reduce the duration of symptoms — could upend treatment in U.S.In mid-November 2015, a photograph purportedly showing what resemble common ladybugs and Japanese beetles embedded on the roof of a dog’s mouth began circulating via Facebook: Most of the users who shared the above-displayed image on Facebook included a variation of the following message: SOMEBODY ASKED ME TO PASS THIS ALONG …. Japanese Beetles and Lady Bugs can attach to the roof of your dog’s mouth, and make him/HER become ill. Symptoms include excessive drooling. Check your dog’s mouth and remove any insects. While we haven’t been able to identify who the “Somebody” is in the above-quoted Facebook post, a message posted by the Hands & Paws group did provide some information about the image’s origin: This posted photograph is recent — posted by a vet tech and when I saw the photo started doing research – because I too thought there was no way the photo could be real. There is no photoshop — there is no hidden agenda. It’s just me. The Founder of a tiny little dog rescue in Florida finding the photo and the facts behind the photo amazing, astonishing and wanted to share the information with my fellow dog lovers. We reached out to Hands & Paws for more information about the image without results, but multiple incidents are on record of beetles embedding in dogs’ mouths, such as this one from November 2016: Frances Jiriks brought her pooch Bailey into Hoisington Veterinary Hospital after he refused to eat, she told KAKE. He was also foaming at the mouth and a bit lethargic, the dog owner said. When they arrived at the animal clinic, Dr. Lindsay Mitchell discovered between 30 and 40 lady beetles clinging to the roof of Bailey’s mouth. The beetles look nearly identical to ladybugs though they secrete a mucus which allows them to stick, as they did inside Bailey’s mouth. The bugs were successfully removed from the dog’s mouth, but Mitchell warned their presence could pose a variety of health risks to man’s best friend. [Video here] In 2008, Lindsey Derek published an article in the journal Toxicon about the subject: A six-year old mixed-breed dog presented with severe trauma to the oral mucosa suggestive of chemical burn. Sixteen Harmonia axyridis (Coccinellidae) were removed from the oral cavity, which revealed trauma consistent with chemical burn. The beetles had become embedded in mucosa covering the hard palate and required manual removal. A diagnosis of beetle induced chemical burn was warranted and consistent with the nature of the chemical constituents of H. axyridis hemolymph. That article also included a photograph of the beetles in the dog’s mouth, which closely resembled the image circulated in November 2015:
💡Okay, so I need to generate a claim based on the given paragraph. The claim has to be one sentence, use information from the paragraph, not have any contradictions, and it can be a sentence from the paragraph itself. Let me read through the paragraph again to understand what it's about.The paragraph talks about a program called the Antarctic Sabbatical by Airbnb. They're sending five people to study microplastics in Antarctica. The volunteers will do lab work in Chile, collect snow samples, climb glaciers, and visit the South Pole. Kirstie Jones-Williams, a scientist, says the goal isn't to create more scientists but to make global ambassadors who can spread awareness about pollution. The program is part of Airbnb's effort to promote eco-friendly travel and raise awareness about tourism's impact. They partnered with Ocean Conservancy to use the research for advocacy. The volunteers don't need a scientific background but should love the environment and be able to handle physical tasks in cold conditions.So, the main points are: Airbnb's Antarctic Sabbatical, five volunteers, study microplastics, environmental advocacy, no scientific background needed, physical tasks required, partnership with Ocean Conservancy.Now, I need to create a claim that's one sentence, uses info from the paragraph, and isn't contradictory. It can be a direct sentence from the paragraph. Let me see if any sentence stands out as a good claim.Looking through, the sentence: "The goal of the program isn’t to create more scientists, but moreso global ambassadors on the dangers of pollution and more." That seems like a strong claim because it directly states the purpose of the program. It's one sentence, uses info from the paragraph, and doesn't have contradictions.Alternatively, another sentence: "Airbnb’s sabbatical program offers its users a chance to take time to do more than see the sights but actually do some good." That's also a good candidate, but the first one about the goal being global ambassadors might be more specific and directly tied to the environmental advocacy aspect.I think the first sentence is better because it clearly states the objective without any contradictions and is concise.