💡Okay, so I need to create a True or False question based on the given Wikipedia article about Jessica Jones season 2. Let me read through the content carefully.The article mentions that Krysten Ritter stars as Jessica Jones, and Rachael Taylor, Carrie-Anne Moss, and Eka Darville return from the first season. Additionally, Wil Traval and David Tennant are in guest roles. New cast members include J.R. Ramirez, Terry Chen, Leah Gibson, and Janet McTeer. The second season was ordered in January 2016, filming started in April 2017, and it wrapped up in September 2017.I need to extract a fact that can be phrased as a yes/no question. Let's see, the casting information is detailed. For instance, it says that Carrie-Anne Moss returns from the first season. So a possible question could be whether Carrie-Anne Moss was in both seasons. Alternatively, the filming timeline could be another point—filming started in April 2017 and ended in September 2017. Wait, the example output for the previous input was about the number of movies in Lego Jurassic World, so it's about a specific detail. Let me focus on the cast. Since Carrie-Anne Moss is mentioned as returning, that's a clear point. So the question could be: "Did Carrie-Anne Moss return for Jessica Jones season 2?" But to make it a statement for a True/False question, it would be phrased as "Carrie-Anne Moss returned for Jessica Jones season 2." Alternatively, considering the filming timeline: "Filming for Jessica Jones season 2 began in April 2017." That's also a factual statement that can be true or false. I think the cast information is more straightforward. So the question would be whether Carrie-Anne Moss returned, which she did. Therefore, the statement would be true. Wait, but the example output was a question, not a statement. Oh, no, looking back, the example output was a statement, like "the bible says honor thy mother and father," which is a statement that can be true or false. So I need to create a similar statement based on the content.So, based on the article, the statement could be: "Carrie-Anne Moss returned for Jessica Jones season 2." That's a direct fact from the article. Alternatively, another point is that filming started in April 2017. So the statement could be: "Filming for Jessica Jones season 2 began in April 2017." I think the cast point is more interesting, so I'll go with that. Therefore, the question would be phrased as a statement: "Carrie-Anne Moss returned for Jessica Jones season 2." Wait, but in the example, the output was a question, but actually, looking again, the output was a statement that can be answered with True or False. So the user wants a statement, not a question. So the output should be a declarative sentence that is either true or false based on the article.So, the correct output would be: "Carrie-Anne Moss returned for Jessica Jones season 2." This is a statement that is true, as per the article. Alternatively, another option is about the filming timeline: "Filming for Jessica Jones season 2 began in April 2017." That's also true.I think the cast point is more likely to be the focus, so I'll go with the Carrie-Anne Moss statement.

💡Okay, so I need to figure out if the statement "The god Apollo resided at Mount Olympus" is true. I'm not super familiar with Greek mythology, but I remember that Mount Olympus is a significant place in their stories. Let me try to break this down.First, I know that Mount Olympus is the highest mountain in Greece and is considered the home of the gods in Greek mythology. The major deities like Zeus, Hera, Athena, and others are said to live there. So, if Apollo is a major god, it makes sense he might be there too.Apollo is one of the Olympian gods, right? I think he's the god of the sun, music, prophecy, and healing. Since he's an Olympian, that should mean he resides on Mount Olympus. But wait, I also remember that some gods have other significant places they're associated with. For example, Poseidon is the god of the sea and lives in the ocean, and Hades is in the underworld. So maybe Apollo has another main residence besides Olympus?I think Apollo is often depicted as having a temple or oracle at Delphi, which is a place people went to seek prophecies. So does that mean he's there instead of Olympus? Or does he have multiple residences? I'm a bit confused now.Wait, maybe the Olympian gods have Mount Olympus as their main home, but they can also be present in other places where they have domains. So Apollo might spend a lot of time at Delphi because of the oracle, but he still technically resides on Mount Olympus as one of the main gods.I should also consider the structure of the Olympian pantheon. The twelve main Olympian gods include Zeus, Hera, Poseidon, Demeter, Athena, Apollo, Artemis, Ares, Aphrodite, Hephaestus, Hermes, and Hestia. Each has their own domains, but they all live on Mount Olympus. So even though Apollo is associated with Delphi, his primary residence is Olympus.I think I've heard that the gods can move freely and aren't confined to one place, but their main home is Olympus. So Apollo would be there, even if he's often depicted elsewhere in myths.So putting it all together, the statement is true because Apollo, being an Olympian god, resided at Mount Olympus, even though he has other significant locations associated with him.

💡Okay, so I need to figure out the currency of Niger. I'm not too familiar with all the countries and their currencies, but I'll try to think it through. Let me start by recalling what I know about Niger. It's a country in Africa, right? I think it's in West Africa. Now, I remember that many African countries use the West African CFA franc, but I'm not sure which ones exactly. I think countries like Nigeria, Ghana, and maybe others use it. Wait, but Niger might be part of a different group. I think some countries use the CFA franc but divided into two zones: one for West Africa and another for Central Africa. So, I'm a bit confused there. Maybe I should look up if Niger is part of the West African CFA zone or the Central African. Alternatively, perhaps they have their own currency. I don't recall Niger having a unique currency, so it's likely they use the CFA franc. To be more precise, I think the West African CFA franc is used by countries like Benin, Togo, and Ivory Coast, among others. So, Niger probably uses the West African CFA franc. I should confirm that, but based on my memory, that's the answer.

💡Okay, so I have this task where I need to simplify a sentence by focusing on lexical paraphrasing. Let me see what that means. Lexical paraphrasing is about replacing words with their synonyms or rephrasing without changing the original meaning. The goal is to make the sentence simpler or more straightforward.Looking at the examples provided, I notice that the original sentences are a bit complex, and the outputs simplify them. For instance, in the first example, "legacy of kings in February 1998, the recording of legacy of kings began" becomes "the recording of legacy of kings began in February 1998." So, the structure is rearranged, and unnecessary repetition is removed.In the second example, "a fundamental connection was noticed" becomes "a basic connection was noticed." Here, "fundamental" is replaced with "basic," which is a simpler synonym. Also, the structure is slightly adjusted for clarity.Now, the third input is: "with the help of an albatross named Orville, the mice fly to the bayou, and meet a dragonfly named Evindrude, who speeds them in a leaf to the ship where Penny is held." I need to simplify this.First, I'll break it down. The sentence has two main parts: the mice flying to the bayou with Orville's help and meeting Evindrude, who helps them reach the ship where Penny is. I can start by rephrasing "with the help of" to "helped by" to make it more concise. Then, "fly to the bayou" can stay as is. Next, "meet a dragonfly named Evindrude" can be simplified to "meet Evindrude, a dragonfly." The part "who speeds them in a leaf to the ship where Penny is held" can be rephrased to "who takes them quickly in a leaf to the ship where Penny is being held." Using "takes them quickly" instead of "speeds them" might be simpler. Also, "held" can be changed to "being held" for clarity.Putting it all together, the simplified sentence would be: "Helped by an albatross named Orville, the mice fly to the bayou and meet Evindrude, a dragonfly who takes them quickly in a leaf to the ship where Penny is being held."I think this captures the original meaning while using simpler words and a clearer structure. I avoided complex phrases and made sure the sentence flows smoothly.

💡Alright, so I need to determine if the given product review is positive. Let me read through the title and the review carefully.The title is "OMG." That's an acronym for "Oh My God," which is often used to express strong emotions, usually positive or excited. In this context, it seems positive because the user is reacting strongly, probably in a good way.Now, looking at the review: "THIS MOVIE WAS GREAT I HAVE WATCH IT AT LEAST 3TIMES ALREADY AND WILL BE WATCHING IT LATER TODAY." The user is using all caps, which often indicates emphasis or excitement. The words "GREAT" and "WATCH IT AT LEAST 3TIMES" suggest that the user really enjoyed the movie and has watched it multiple times. Additionally, they mention they'll be watching it again later, which shows enthusiasm and satisfaction.There's no negative language here. The user is clearly expressing satisfaction with the movie, indicating a positive experience. They didn't mention any issues or dislikes, so it's safe to assume the review is positive.I should also consider the structure. The title is short and exclamation-filled, which is typical for positive reviews. The review itself is enthusiastic, with repeated watching as a sign of approval.So, putting it all together, the title and the content of the review both indicate a positive sentiment. The user loved the movie enough to watch it multiple times and plans to watch it again, which is a strong indicator of a positive review.

💡Alright, I need to classify this Bengali post into either "personal" or "non-personal." The post says, "বাংলাদেশ হয়ে গেছে আজ ভারতের পাচাটা গোলাম." Let's break this down.First, I'll translate it to understand the context. It translates to, "Bangladesh has become today India's fifth province." The user is comparing Bangladesh to a province of India, which is a political statement. Now, I need to determine if this is personal or non-personal. Personal attacks usually target specific individuals or a small group based on protected characteristics like race, religion, etc. Non-personal attacks are more about groups, communities, or nations without targeting specific individuals.In this case, the statement is about Bangladesh as a whole, not targeting any specific person or small group. It's a broader criticism of the nation's status in relation to India. Therefore, it doesn't fit the personal category. So, the classification should be non-personal.